Quesenberry v. Ansco Associates

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedJanuary 30, 1998
DocketI.C. No. 322638
StatusPublished

This text of Quesenberry v. Ansco Associates (Quesenberry v. Ansco Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quesenberry v. Ansco Associates, (N.C. Super. Ct. 1998).

Opinion

The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Cramer and the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing parties have not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence; receive further evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives; or amend the Opinion and Award with the exception of clarifying the stipulations of the parties and the modification to Finding of Fact Number 21.

***********

The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties in a 9 May 1995 Pre-trial Order as:

STIPULATIONS

1. At the time of the admittedly compensable injury by accident the parties were subject to and bound by the provisions of the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act.

2. An employee-employer relationship existed between plaintiff and defendant-employer at all relevant times.

3. Aetna Life Casualty Insurance Company was the workers' compensation carrier on the risk.

4. This case involves an admittedly compensable injury to plaintiff's left knee sustained on 1 March 1993.

The Full Commission adopts the findings of fact found by the Deputy Commissioner and finds as follows:

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. At the time of the admittedly compensable injury by accident the parties were subject to and bound by the provisions of the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act.

2. An employee-employer relationship existed between plaintiff and defendant-employer at all relevant times.

3. Aetna Life Casualty Insurance Company was the workers' compensation carrier on the risk.

4. Plaintiff was forty-one years of age at the time of the accident on 1 March 1993. He was employed by defendant as a heavy equipment operator for a period of five years prior to the accident and received an average weekly wage of $513.38.

5. On 1 March 1993 plaintiff was attempting to load a backhoe onto a trailer when he saw the truck begin to move. He jumped a distance of approximately eight feet from the backhoe to the ground, twisting his left knee when he landed. He heard a popping sound and his leg felt numb and he began to experience pain in the knee.

6. Plaintiff was taken to Baptist Hospital. His left leg was swollen and bruised from his knee to his groin. He was diagnosed as having a depression fracture of the tibial plateau of his left leg.

7. Plaintiff came under the care of Dr. David Janeway, an orthopaedic surgeon, who first saw him on 8 March 1993. A tomogram indicated a minimal depression fracture at the tibial plateau of the left knee, with a possible small intra-articular fragment. Dr. Janeway continued to keep Plaintiff in a knee immobilizer to allow the fracture to heal.

8. An arthroscopy of the left knee was performed on 14 April 1993 during which Dr. Janeway removed the loose fragment, removed overgrown tissue from the lining of the knee, and shaved cartilage to give a smoother joint surface.

9. During his recovery plaintiff began to complain of tenderness and swelling in the inguinal area. Dr. Janeway also noticed varicosities in the left leg. Plaintiff has a history of problems with varicose veins in both legs dating back to his teens. In 1977 plaintiff had the veins in both legs surgically stripped to improve circulation. Dr. Janeway's opined that plaintiff's varicose veins problems had existed long before and were not caused by plaintiff's injury by accident of 1 March 1993.

10. On 5 May 1993 plaintiff was seen by Dr. Eduardo Gonzales, a general surgeon, regarding the varicose veins in his left leg. Dr. Gonzales recommended conservative treatment with support compression stockings. Dr. Gonzales' opined that plaintiff's varicose veins in the left leg pre-existed, took a long time to develop and were not caused by the 1 March 1993 injury by accident.

11. Pursuant to a Form 21 agreement between the parties, plaintiff received temporary total disability payments in the weekly amount of $342.27 beginning 2 March 1993.

12. On 19 July 1993 plaintiff returned to work. Due to continuing problems with swelling in his leg and groin, he was limited to office work. Disability payments were discontinued as of 2 August 1993. Plaintiff discontinued working on 9 August 1993, and disability payments were resumed beginning on that date.

13. On 13 September 1993, plaintiff underwent surgery by Dr. Bruce Middleton to repair a femoral hernia in his left groin area. Dr. Middleton opined that the hernia could have been a result of the injury sustained on 1 March 1993.

14. Plaintiff attempted to return to work in December 1993 but was laid off due to lack of work. Plaintiff's disability compensation payments were continued through 27 February 1994.

15. On 4 January 1994, Dr. Janeway released plaintiff for work with the limitation of no standing or walking for more than two hours in any given day and no prolonged carrying. On 21 February 1994, Dr. Janeway found plaintiff to be at maximum medical improvement with a 15 percent permanent partial disability in his left leg.

16. On 10 February 1994 plaintiff was seen by Dr. Gary Poehling for continuing problems with his knee joint and the increasing size of varicose veins in his leg and left groin. Surgery was not recommended and plaintiff was referred to Dr. Wayne Meredith. Following an examination on 22 February 1994 Dr. Meredith eliminated the possibility of a hernia, and diagnosed a lymph node in plaintiff's groin. The lymph node is not shown to be causally connected to the compensable injury. Dr. Meredith placed no work restriction on plaintiff, stating that he "can continue doing his work as he is doing now."

17. The greater weight of the medical evidence shows that plaintiff had a long history of varicose veins in his legs. The varicose veins problems in his left leg were not caused by or significantly aggravated by his accident of 1 March 1993.

18. Plaintiff's left femoral hernia was most likely caused by his accident of 1 March 1993 and therefore is compensable.

19. Following plaintiff's release to return to work by Dr. Janeway and Dr. Meredith's release in late February 1994 plaintiff made no attempt to locate employment. However, during the months of March, April and May 1994, plaintiff was placed under surveillance and was observed and videotaped doing manual work around his house. He spent several hours working on a concession trailer in his yard and spent at least one hour on a ten to twelve foot ladder doing repairs on the exterior of his house near the roofline. Plaintiff was able to stand for at least an hour at a time, bend, reach overhead and work with tools, climb the ladder, and walk without any apparent difficulty or distress.

20. As of 4 January 1994 plaintiff was capable of returning to gainful employment within the restrictions given by Dr. Janeway. By 21 February 1994 plaintiff had reached maximum medical improvement and continued to be capable of pursuing gainful employment. He made no effort to find suitable employment. Plaintiff's failure to return to work was due to his own failure to look for employment and to his failure to cooperate with rehabilitation efforts.

21. Defendant is entitled to a credit against the total partial disability due plaintiff equal to the amount of temporary total disability compensation paid to plaintiff after 4 January 1994.

Based upon the findings of fact, the Full Commission concludes as follows:

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

1. On 1 March 1993 plaintiff sustained an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment with defendant which resulted in injury to plaintiff's left knee and a left femoral hernia. N.C. Gen.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Stone v. G G Builders
484 S.E.2d 365 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1997)
Radzisz v. Harley Davidson of Metrolina, Inc.
484 S.E.2d 566 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Quesenberry v. Ansco Associates, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quesenberry-v-ansco-associates-ncworkcompcom-1998.