Quesada v. Marten Transport, Ltd

District Court, E.D. California·Decided June 25, 2024·No. 2:23-cv-00311·Unknown

Opinion

RAMON QUESADA, Case No. 2:23-cv-311-DAD-CSK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MODIFIED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (ECF No. 106) MARTEN TRANSPORT, LTD et al., Defendants. The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulated protective order below (ECF No. 106), and finds it comports with the relevant authorities and the Court’s Local Rule. See L.R. 141.1. The Court APPROVES the protective order, subject to the following clarification. The Court’s Local Rules indicate that once an action is closed, it “will not retain jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of any protective order filed in that action.” L.R. 141.1(f); see MD Helicopters, Inc. v. Aerometals, Inc., 2017 WL 495778 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2017) (noting that courts in the district generally do not retain jurisdiction for disputes concerning protective orders after closure of the case). Thus, the Court will not retain jurisdiction over this protective order once the case is closed. Dated: June 24, 2024 Cina Spo GHI 500 KIM sues UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAMON QUESADA, Ca se No. 2:23-cv-00311-DAD-CSK

Plaintiff, v. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER MARTEN TRANSPORT, LTD.,1 MARTEN TRANSPORT SERVICES, LTD., ANN BAUER, TABETHA2 Trial Date: 5/12/2025 CRANDALL, JEFFREY GREILING, and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Second Amended Complaint Filed: 1/10/2024 Defendants.

A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The 1 To the best of Defendant Marten Transport, Ltd.’s knowledge, there is no corporate entity known parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. This action is likely to involve information or documents that contain proprietary, confidential business, financial, trade secret, and/or commercially sensitive information, individualized personal information of Plaintiff, including Plaintiff’s personnel file, compensation and benefits information, and medical records and medical information, and personal, private, or sensitive information of non-parties, for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is warranted. Such confidential and proprietary materials and information consist of, among other things, confidential business or financial information, information regarding confidential business practices, or other confidential business and personnel information (including information implicating privacy rights of third parties), plaintiffs personal text messages, and financial documents such as tax forms, information otherwise generally unavailable to the public (including insurance policies), or which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties that information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case. 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 Action: the above-entitled proceeding, captioned as Ramon Quesada v. Marten Transport, Ltd., Marten Transport Services, Ltd., Ann Bauer, Tabetha Crandall, and Jeffrey Greiling, Case No. 2:23-cv-00311-DAD-CSK, pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or items under this Order. 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good Cause Statement. 2.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record (as well as their support staff). 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 2.8 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 2.9 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff. 2.10 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 2.11 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this Action. 2.12 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 2.13 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 2.14 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a Producing Party. 3. SCOPE The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material; so long as such information, copies, excerpts, summaries, compilations, testimony, conversations, or presentations are independently designated as confidential pursuant to this order within 30 days . Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the trial judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected Materia

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quesada v. Marten Transport, Ltd, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Quesada v. Marten Transport, Ltd (Quesada v. Marten Transport, Ltd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.