Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Quero v. Ryan

Quero v. Ryan

104 So. 3d 392, 2013 WL 142259, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 481
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 14, 2013
DocketNo. 3D13-92
StatusPublished

This text of 104 So. 3d 392 (Quero v. Ryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quero v. Ryan, 104 So. 3d 392, 2013 WL 142259, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 481 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

CORTINAS, j.

Based on the State’s proper confession of error, we grant the petition for writ of habeas corpus and remand this cause to the trial court. The State shall have no more than three business days following the issuance of this opinion to file a legally sufficient motion for pretrial detention. [393]*393Should the State fail to file such a motion, the trial court shall immediately thereafter conduct a hearing pursuant to Rule 3.131 to determine appropriate conditions of release. The defendant shall remain in custody pending the determination of pretrial release or detention. Ginsberg v. Ryan, 60 So.3d 475, 478 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).

This opinion shall take effect immediately notwithstanding the filing or disposition of any motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ginsberg v. Ryan
60 So. 3d 475 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 So. 3d 392, 2013 WL 142259, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quero-v-ryan-fladistctapp-2013.