Querim v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

9 F. App'x 35
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedApril 11, 2001
DocketNo. 00-6224
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 9 F. App'x 35 (Querim v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Querim v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 9 F. App'x 35 (2d Cir. 2001).

Opinion

[36]*36 SUMMARY ORDER

This cause came on to be heard on the record from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and was argued by plaintiff pro se and by counsel for defendants.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the order of said District Court be and it hereby is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Patterson’s Opinion and Order dated March 6, 2000, and his Opinion and Order dated April 27, 2000.

We have considered all of plaintiffs contentions on this appeal and have found in them no basis for reversal. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

PRZYWIECZERSK v. BLINKEN
D. New Jersey, 2021
Sash v. United States
674 F. Supp. 2d 531 (S.D. New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 F. App'x 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/querim-v-equal-employment-opportunity-commission-ca2-2001.