Quenzer v. Morris-Morris Corp.

250 A.D. 726, 293 N.Y.S. 288, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8631
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 11, 1937
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 250 A.D. 726 (Quenzer v. Morris-Morris Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quenzer v. Morris-Morris Corp., 250 A.D. 726, 293 N.Y.S. 288, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8631 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Opinion

Order confirming referee’s report, which computed the amount due in a foreclosure action, and directing sale of the mortgaged premises reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and matter remitted to the Special Term to take proof upon and to determine the amount due, together with taxable costs and disbursements, in accordance with section 1077-e of the Civil Practice Act, and to provide the appellant with an opportunity to make payment. Under the statute, the appellant has an unqualified right to have the action dismissed upon making the requisite payments, and a tender thereof is sufficient to effect a stay of the sale. It is clear that the amount tendered is approximately the sum due, and any slight difference may be supplied [727]*727in the event a determination so warrants. The facts as averred in appellant’s affidavit are undenied. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lo Schiavo v. McKinney
269 A.D. 1056 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
250 A.D. 726, 293 N.Y.S. 288, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quenzer-v-morris-morris-corp-nyappdiv-1937.