Quentin Lionel Laws v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-15-01101-CR Style: Quentin Lionel Laws v. The State of Texas Date motion filed*: March 30, 2016 Type of motion: Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Pro Se Anders Response Party filing motion: Pro se appellant Document to be filed: Anders Response
Is appeal accelerated? No.
If motion to extend time: Original due date: March 15, 2016 Number of extensions granted: 1 Current due date: April 15, 2016 Date requested: N/A (30 days from granting of motion)
Ordered that motions are: Granted If document is to be filed, document due: May 5, 2016. No further extensions of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances. Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________ Appellant’s second motion for an extension of time to file his pro se Anders response is granted because the trial clerk filed confirmation of delivery of the records to the pro se appellant on March 2, 2016. However, appellant is warned that no further extensions will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances, and if his response is not filed by May 5, 2016, the Clerk of this Court may mark this case ready for submission without appellant’s pro se Anders response.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes Court
Date: April 5, 2016
November 7, 2008 Revision
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Quentin Lionel Laws v. State (Quentin Lionel Laws v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.