Quentin Cornelius Kyle v. Shakeria Sharee Kyle Office of the Attorney General
This text of Quentin Cornelius Kyle v. Shakeria Sharee Kyle Office of the Attorney General (Quentin Cornelius Kyle v. Shakeria Sharee Kyle Office of the Attorney General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued August 13, 2024
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00168-CV ——————————— QUENTIN KYLE, Appellant V. SHAKERIA KYLE, Appellee
On Appeal from the 505th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 22-DCV-290919
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Quentin Kyle, filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s
February 26, 2024 Final Decree of Divorce. Appellant has neither paid the required
fees nor established indigence for purposes of costs. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145; TEX.
R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.851(b), 51.941(a); Order, Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts
of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket
No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). On March 22, 2024, appellant was notified that
this appeal was subject to dismissal if appellate costs were not paid, or indigence
was not established, by April 22, 2024. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). Appellant
did not adequately respond.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and
want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f). We dismiss any
pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Guerra, and Farris.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Quentin Cornelius Kyle v. Shakeria Sharee Kyle Office of the Attorney General, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quentin-cornelius-kyle-v-shakeria-sharee-kyle-office-of-the-attorney-texapp-2024.