Quentin-2nd Street Corp. v. Herman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Quentin-2nd Street Corp. v. Herman

16 A.D.2d 699, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10080

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 30, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 16 A.D.2d 699 (Quentin-2nd Street Corp. v. Herman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Quentin-2nd Street Corp. v. Herman, 16 A.D.2d 699, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10080 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review and annul the determination of the State Rent Administrator which denied petitioner’s protest and affirmed the Local Administrator’s order refusing to issue a certificate of eviction to enable petitioner, as landlord, to prosecute summary proceedings for the removal of a tenant from a certain apartment, the petitioner appeals from a final order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 12, 1961, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding. Order affirmed, without costs. Upon the instant record, the petitioner failed to adduce satisfactory proof that the subject apartment was the only one available for a resident superintendent. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review and annul the determination of the State Rent Administrator which denied petitioner’s protest and affirmed the Local Administrator’s order refusing to issue a certificate of eviction to enable petitioner, as landlord, to prosecute summary proceedings for the removal of a tenant from a certain apartment, the petitioner appeals from a final order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 12, 1961, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding. Order affirmed, without costs. Upon the instant record, the petitioner failed to adduce satisfactory proof that the subject apartment was the only one available for a resident superintendent. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.2d 699, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10080, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quentin-2nd-street-corp-v-herman-nyappdiv-1962.