Quentes v. State

151 S.W. 301, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 713
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 20, 1912·Published

Opinion

PRENDERGAST, J.

The appellant was convicted of burglary, and given the lowest penalty.

There is no bill of exception and no statement of facts. The only question raised is by a motion for new trial, to the effect that the verdict and judgment is contrary to the law and the evidence. Of course, this cannot be passed upon without a statement of facts.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quentes v. State, 151 S.W. 301, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 713 (Tex. 1912).

151 S.W. 301 (Quentes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.