Quelprud v. Kothe

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Quelprud v. Kothe

58 N.W. 682, 57 Minn. 114, 1894 Minn. LEXIS 234

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedApril 20, 1894

DocketNo. 8462

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 58 N.W. 682 (Quelprud v. Kothe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Quelprud v. Kothe, 58 N.W. 682, 57 Minn. 114, 1894 Minn. LEXIS 234 (Mich. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

As was stated by the court below in its charge to the jury, no exception being taken thereto, the only dispute between the parties was whether plaintiff had been paid in full for his services, and on this the finding was in his favor. There was evidence reasonably tending to support the verdict, for we do not agree with counsel for defendant in his assertion that plaintiff’s testimony was so inconsistent, improbable, and contradictory that it should have been wholly rejected.

Order affirmed.

(Opinion published 58 N. W. 682.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

As was stated by the court below in its charge to the jury, no exception being taken thereto, the only dispute between the parties was whether plaintiff had been paid in full for his services, and on this the finding was in his favor. There was evidence reasonably tending to support the verdict, for we do not agree with counsel for defendant in his assertion that plaintiff’s testimony was so inconsistent, improbable, and contradictory that it should have been wholly rejected.

Order affirmed.

(Opinion published 58 N. W. 682.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 N.W. 682, 57 Minn. 114, 1894 Minn. LEXIS 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quelprud-v-kothe-minn-1894.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack