Queensboro Transformer & Machinery Corp. v. United States
59 Cust. Ct. 343, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2165
Opinion
When, the above case was called, plaintiff, a corporation, was advised it must be represented by counsel. Since plaintiff did not desire to hire or proceed by counsel, the court sua sponte dismissed the case.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Queensboro Transformer & Machinery Corp. v. United States, 59 Cust. Ct. 343, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2165 (cusc 1967).
59 Cust. Ct. 343 (Queensboro Transformer & Machinery Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.