Queens Vending Corp. v. City of New York

16 Misc. 2d 968, 189 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 897
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 30, 1935
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 16 Misc. 2d 968 (Queens Vending Corp. v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Queens Vending Corp. v. City of New York, 16 Misc. 2d 968, 189 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 897 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1935).

Opinion

Edgar J. Lauer, J.

Plaintiff, a vendor of gum .sold to the public through the medium of vending machines for the price of one cent for each piece of gum, seeks to enjoin the Comptroller of the City of New York from collecting the taxes under Local Law No. 24 of the City of New York for 1934, known as the Sales Tax. I can see no valid basis for interfering with the defendant in the collection of the tax. The plaintiff contends that if it is to pay the tax it would be necessary for it to violate the law because the law forbids a person selling property or service subject to the tax to absorb the tax. It would seem that the plaintiff misinterprets the provisions of the law. Section 3, which authorizes the Comptroller to prescribe regulations for a method or schedule as to the amounts to be collected from the purchasers also provides such schedule or .schedules may provide that no tax need be collected from the purchaser upon receipts below a stated sum.” Plaintiff also contends that it is discriminated against, but this does not appear .to be the fact, as everybody who sells articles for twelve cents or under is in the same position as the plaintiff. The mere fact that the plaintiff specializes in the sale of articles for one cent does not make the method of collection a discrimination against the plaintiff where as here everybody is in the same position with regard to the sale of articles below twelve cents. There is no discrimination within the plaintiff’s classification.

Plaintiff’s application is without merit and must be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

New York Automatic Canteen Corp. v. Joseph
8 A.D.2d 385 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 Misc. 2d 968, 189 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/queens-vending-corp-v-city-of-new-york-nysupct-1935.