Queen'Prinyah Godiah NMIAA Payne's El-Bey v. Leyland Crocilla , Cona Michel, Porter, Vollas, Ward, Metropolitan Authority Policy Benevolent Association & Police Benevolent Association Metropolitan Transportation Authority, MTA, MTA 34 Precinct at Penn Station, the City of New York, NY State Bellevue Hospital & Bellevue Hospital Staff
This text of Queen'Prinyah Godiah NMIAA Payne's El-Bey v. Leyland Crocilla , Cona Michel, Porter, Vollas, Ward, Metropolitan Authority Policy Benevolent Association & Police Benevolent Association Metropolitan Transportation Authority, MTA, MTA 34 Precinct at Penn Station, the City of New York, NY State Bellevue Hospital & Bellevue Hospital Staff (Queen'Prinyah Godiah NMIAA Payne's El-Bey v. Leyland Crocilla , Cona Michel, Porter, Vollas, Ward, Metropolitan Authority Policy Benevolent Association & Police Benevolent Association Metropolitan Transportation Authority, MTA, MTA 34 Precinct at Penn Station, the City of New York, NY State Bellevue Hospital & Bellevue Hospital Staff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-22-00333-CV
QUEEN'PRINYAH GODIAH NMIAA PAYNE'S EL-BEY, Appellant v.
CROCILLA LEYLAND, CONA MICHEL, PORTER, VOLLAS, WARD, METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY POLICY BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION & POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION, METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, MTA, MTA 34 PRECINCT AT PENN STATION, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, NY STATE BELLEVUE HOSPITAL & BELLEVUE HOSPITAL STAFF, Appellees
From the United States District Court, Southern District of New York New York, New York Trial Court No. 20-CV-524-MKV
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Queen'Prinyah Godiah NMIAA Payne's El-Bey attempts to appeal a letter from a
United States District Court. By letter, the Clerk of this Court informed El-Bey that her appeal was subject to dismissal because no final, appealable judgment or order has been
signed by the trial court, see TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(b); 26.2, and because this Court has no
jurisdiction of an appeal from a Federal Court’s order if one was signed. See TEX. CONST.
art. V, § 6; TEX. GOV'T CODE § 22.201. In the same letter, the Clerk warned El-Bey that the
appeal would be dismissed unless El-Bey responded showing grounds for continuing the
appeal. El-Bey has not shown grounds for continuing the appeal.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
TOM GRAY Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson, and Justice Smith Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed November 2, 2022 [CV06]
El-Bey v. Crocilla Leyland, et al. Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Queen'Prinyah Godiah NMIAA Payne's El-Bey v. Leyland Crocilla , Cona Michel, Porter, Vollas, Ward, Metropolitan Authority Policy Benevolent Association & Police Benevolent Association Metropolitan Transportation Authority, MTA, MTA 34 Precinct at Penn Station, the City of New York, NY State Bellevue Hospital & Bellevue Hospital Staff, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/queenprinyah-godiah-nmiaa-paynes-el-bey-v-leyland-crocilla-cona-texapp-2022.