Queen v. Warden
This text of 486 F. App'x 374 (Queen v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Nicholas James Queen, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Queen v. Warden, No. 1:12-cv-02257-WMN (D.Md. Aug. 24, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
486 F. App'x 374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/queen-v-warden-ca4-2012.