Queen v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Queen v. State

479 S.W.3d 678, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1036, 2015 WL 5934198

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 13, 2015

DocketNo. ED 101841

StatusPublished

This text of 479 S.W.3d 678 (Queen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Queen v. State, 479 S.W.3d 678, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1036, 2015 WL 5934198 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donald Lee Queen, Jr. (“Movant”) appeals the motion court’s denial of his reopened Rule 29.15¹ motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant’s motion after an evidentiary hearing. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donald Lee Queen, Jr. (“Movant”) appeals the motion court’s denial of his reopened Rule 29.15¹ motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant’s motion after an evidentiary hearing. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

479 S.W.3d 678, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1036, 2015 WL 5934198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/queen-v-state-moctapp-2015.