Queen v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Queen v. State

479 S.W.3d 678, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1036, 2015 WL 5934198

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 13, 2015·No. No. ED 101841·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donald Lee Queen, Jr. (“Movant”) appeals the motion court’s denial of his reopened Rule 29.15¹ motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant’s motion after an evidentiary hearing. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donald Lee Queen, Jr. (“Movant”) appeals the motion court’s denial of his reopened Rule 29.15¹ motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant’s motion after an evidentiary hearing. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).

Footnotes

Queen v. State, 479 S.W.3d 678, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1036, 2015 WL 5934198 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

479 S.W.3d 678 (Queen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.