Queen v. Snowbird Valley Railroad

76 S.E. 682, 161 N.C. 217, 1912 N.C. LEXIS 399
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 14, 1912
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 76 S.E. 682 (Queen v. Snowbird Valley Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Queen v. Snowbird Valley Railroad, 76 S.E. 682, 161 N.C. 217, 1912 N.C. LEXIS 399 (N.C. 1912).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a nonsuit. The defendant’s motion to dismiss because there is no assignment of error cannot be allowed, because the appeal from the judgment is of itself an assignment of error. Wilson v. Lumber Co., 131 N. C., 163, and cases there cited; Mershon v. Morris, 148 N. C., 51.

But there is no case on appeal settled by the judge or by counsel. The evidence in the shape of question and answer is dumped into the record, and there is nothing to show that it is correct. Besides, while there is leave to sue as a pauper, there is no leave to appeal as a pauper, no appeal bond, and no printed record nor any printed brief on behalf of the plaintiff.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Will of Edwards
90 S.E. 418 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 S.E. 682, 161 N.C. 217, 1912 N.C. LEXIS 399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/queen-v-snowbird-valley-railroad-nc-1912.