Queen v. City of Douglasville

516 S.E.2d 379, 237 Ga. App. 756, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 1837, 1999 Ga. App. LEXIS 704
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Queen v. City of Douglasville. Read the opinion of the Court — 232 Ga. App. 68
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 27, 1999·No. A97A1936·Published

Opinion

Judge Harold R. Banke.1

In Divisions 1 and 2 of Queen v. City of Douglasville, 232 Ga. App. 68 (500 SE2d 918) (1998), we held that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to the City of Douglasville on the appellants’ claims of nuisance and negligence. On certiorari, the Supreme Court reversed these holdings. City of Douglasville v. Queen, 270 Ga. 770 (514 SE2d 195) (1999). The Supreme Court affirmed our holding in Division 3 of the opinion. Accordingly, odr decision is vacated with respect to Divisions 1 and 2, the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court with respect to Divisions 1 and 2, and the trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

McMurray, P. J, Pope, P. J., Andrews, Smith, Ruffin and Eldridge, JJ, concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Queen v. City of Douglasville, 516 S.E.2d 379, 237 Ga. App. 756, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 1837, 1999 Ga. App. LEXIS 704 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999).

516 S.E.2d 379 (Queen v. City of Douglasville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Queen v. City of Douglasville
500 S.E.2d 918 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1998)
City of Douglasville v. Queen
514 S.E.2d 195 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1999)