Queen v. City of Douglasville
This text of 516 S.E.2d 379 (Queen v. City of Douglasville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In Divisions 1 and 2 of Queen v. City of Douglasville, 232 Ga. App. 68 (500 SE2d 918) (1998), we held that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to the City of Douglasville on the appellants’ claims of nuisance and negligence. On certiorari, the Supreme Court reversed these holdings. City of Douglasville v. Queen, 270 Ga. 770 (514 SE2d 195) (1999). The Supreme Court affirmed our holding in Division 3 of the opinion. Accordingly, odr decision is vacated with respect to Divisions 1 and 2, the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court with respect to Divisions 1 and 2, and the trial court’s judgment is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
516 S.E.2d 379, 237 Ga. App. 756, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 1837, 1999 Ga. App. LEXIS 704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/queen-v-city-of-douglasville-gactapp-1999.