Queen Tufting Company v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company
This text of 239 S.E.2d 27 (Queen Tufting Company v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This court granted the application for writ of certiorari to review the decision and judgment of the Court of Appeals in Queen Tufting Co. v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., 141 Ga. App. 792 (234 SE2d 354) (1977). The *844 Court of Appeals affirmed the grant of a summary judgment for the defendant on the ground that plaintiffs failure to file suit within the time stated in the insurance contract barred the action. The provision of the contract stated: "No suit or action on this policy for the recovery of any claim shall be sustainable in any Court of law or equity unless the insured shall have fully complied with all the requirements of this policy, nor unless commenced within twelve (12) months next after the happening of the loss, unless a longer period of time is provided by applicable statute.”
The loss occurred approximately two and one-half years prior to the filing of the suit.
A majority of the Court of Appeals held that Code § 3-705, which provides for a six-year limitation on contract actions, was inapplicable. Three judges dissented. In our opinion, Code § 3-705 is the applicable statute.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
239 S.E.2d 27, 239 Ga. 843, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 1352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/queen-tufting-company-v-firemans-fund-insurance-company-ga-1977.