Queen Mother Dr. Delois Blakely v. Pitts
This text of 80 A.D.3d 451 (Queen Mother Dr. Delois Blakely v. Pitts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Doris Ling-Cohan, J.), entered January 13, 2009, which, in an action seeking, inter alia, to set aside an alleged fraudulent mortgage loan, denied plaintiffs motion to vacate a prior order, same court (Richard F. Braun, J.), entered August 22, 2008, dismissing the complaint for failure to appear at a compliance conference, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The motion court’s denial of plaintiffs motion was a provident exercise of discretion (see generally Goldman v Cotter, 10 AD3d 289, 291 [2004]). Although the illness that allegedly prevented plaintiff from attending the compliance conference could be considered a reasonable excuse (see e.g. Frenchy’s Bar & Grill v United Intl. Ins. Co., 251 AD2d 177 [1998]), plaintiff has failed to allege facts setting forth a meritorious cause of action (see M-Dean Realty Corp. v General Sec. Ins. Co., 6 AD3d 169, 171 [2004]). Concur — Saxe, J.P., Friedman, McGuire, Abdus-Salaam and Román, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
80 A.D.3d 451, 913 N.Y.S.2d 557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/queen-mother-dr-delois-blakely-v-pitts-nyappdiv-2011.