Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Queck-Berner v. Ward Baking Co.

Queck-Berner v. Ward Baking Co.

171 A.D. 929, 155 N.Y.S. 1135
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1915
StatusPublished

This text of 171 A.D. 929 (Queck-Berner v. Ward Baking Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Queck-Berner v. Ward Baking Co., 171 A.D. 929, 155 N.Y.S. 1135 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Assuming what is not the fact, that the proof established the carelessness of the defendant, it would be an undue expansion of the doctrine of liability announced in Thomas v. Winchester (6 N. Y. 397) and cognate cases, to include this ease within the application of that doctrine. Present — Jenks, P.. J., Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Putnam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thomas v. . Winchester
6 N.Y. 397 (New York Court of Appeals, 1852)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 A.D. 929, 155 N.Y.S. 1135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/queck-berner-v-ward-baking-co-nyappdiv-1915.