Quay's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Quay's Estate

97 A. 1029, 253 Pa. 80, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 786

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 20, 1916

DocketAppeal, No. 37

StatusPublished

Cited by15 cases

This text of 97 A. 1029 (Quay's Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Quay's Estate, 97 A. 1029, 253 Pa. 80, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 786 (Pa. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The excess realized by the trustees in this estate over the value of the American Tobacco Company stock at the time of the testator’s death formed no part of the corpus of that portion of his estate placed in trust for his son, A. G. C. Quay, but Avas income or profit, not to be held for the remaindermen: Stokes’ Estate (No. 1), 240 Pa. 277.

The decree is affirmed on the opinion of the learned court beloAV directing it to be entered, the costs to be paid out of the fund to be distributed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The excess realized by the trustees in this estate over the value of the American Tobacco Company stock at the time of the testator’s death formed no part of the corpus of that portion of his estate placed in trust for his son, A. G. C. Quay, but Avas income or profit, not to be held for the remaindermen: Stokes’ Estate (No. 1), 240 Pa. 277.

The decree is affirmed on the opinion of the learned court beloAV directing it to be entered, the costs to be paid out of the fund to be distributed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 A. 1029, 253 Pa. 80, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quays-estate-pa-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack