Quayle v. City of New York

253 A.D. 735, 300 N.Y.S. 623, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5376

Opinion

In an action to recover a part of the plaintiff’s salary withheld by the defendant, the plaintiff had judgment on the pleadings. The sole question presented in this court was whether the plaintiff, by accepting checks for lesser sums than the amount due on his salary, had waived his rights and that there had been accord and satisfaction under the provisions of section 149 of the Greater New York Charter. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. There was no waiver or accord and satisfaction. (Matter of Flaherty v. Craig, 184 App. Div. 428, 432; revd. on other grounds, 226 N. Y. 76; Wright v. State of New York, 223 id. 44; Matter of People ex rel. Davis v. Berry, 240 App. Div. 986.) Present —■ Hagarty, Davis, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quayle v. City of New York, 253 A.D. 735, 300 N.Y.S. 623, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5376 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

253 A.D. 735 (Quayle v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Flaherty v. . Craig
123 N.E. 157 (New York Court of Appeals, 1919)
Flaherty v. Craig
184 A.D. 428 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1918)
People ex rel. Davis v. Berry
240 A.D. 986 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933)