Quattrucci v. Turnbull

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Quattrucci v. Turnbull

160 A.D. 910, 144 N.Y.S. 1141

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1913

StatusPublished

This text of 160 A.D. 910 (Quattrucci v. Turnbull) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Quattrucci v. Turnbull, 160 A.D. 910, 144 N.Y.S. 1141 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

The explanation given by the plaintiff for failure to bring his action on for trial within the period of more than five years since issue was joined, is not sufficient to excuse the delay, within the rule laid down in repeated decisions of this court. Order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute reasonably is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr and Stapleton, JJ., concurred; Putnam, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The explanation given by the plaintiff for failure to bring his action on for trial within the period of more than five years since issue was joined, is not sufficient to excuse the delay, within the rule laid down in repeated decisions of this court. Order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute reasonably is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr and Stapleton, JJ., concurred; Putnam, J., not voting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 A.D. 910, 144 N.Y.S. 1141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quattrucci-v-turnbull-nyappdiv-1913.