Quattlebaum v. Black

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Quattlebaum v. Black

22 S.C. 587, 1885 S.C. LEXIS 60

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedJanuary 30, 1885

DocketNo. 1646

StatusPublished

This text of 22 S.C. 587 (Quattlebaum v. Black) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Quattlebaum v. Black, 22 S.C. 587, 1885 S.C. LEXIS 60 (S.C. 1885).

Pincite

Opinion

per Curiam,

This was a motion by J. W. Tompkins, respondent, to have inserted in the Brief in this case, the order for judgment in the case of Tompkins v. Barr, rendered by the Circuit judge after' the hearing of this case, the purpose being to furnish additional ground for sustaining the Circuit decree by showing that the rights of the appellants had been determined and settled in said case of Tompkins v. Barr. The motion was refused, the court saying that they could not incorporate in the case as made for appeal, evidence of a fact which occurred after the trial below, and which was not, nor could have been, introduced there.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

per Curiam,

This was a motion by J. W. Tompkins, respondent, to have inserted in the Brief in this case, the order for judgment in the case of Tompkins v. Barr, rendered by the Circuit judge after' the hearing of this case, the purpose being to furnish additional ground for sustaining the Circuit decree by showing that the rights of the appellants had been determined and settled in said case of Tompkins v. Barr. The motion was refused, the court saying that they could not incorporate in the case as made for appeal, evidence of a fact which occurred after the trial below, and which was not, nor could have been, introduced there.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 S.C. 587, 1885 S.C. LEXIS 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quattlebaum-v-black-sc-1885.