Quattlebaum v. Allstate Insurance Company

168 S.E.2d 596, 119 Ga. App. 791, 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 1248
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 16, 1969
Docket44454
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 168 S.E.2d 596 (Quattlebaum v. Allstate Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quattlebaum v. Allstate Insurance Company, 168 S.E.2d 596, 119 Ga. App. 791, 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 1248 (Ga. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinion

Felton, Chief Judge.

1. A condition precedent to an action against an insurer to recover benefits under uninsured motorists coverage, pursuant to Ga. L. 1963, p. 588; as amended, Ga. L. 1968, pp. 1415, 1416 (Code Ann. § 56-407.1), is the bring *792 ing of an action and the recovery of judgment against the known uninsured motorist. Gulf Amer. Fire &c. Co. v. McNeal, 115 Ga. App. 286, 292 (154 SE2d 411) and eit.

Argued May 5, 1969 Decided May 16, 1969— Rehearing denied June 13, 1969 Calhoun <&. Kernaghan, Herbert Kernaghan, William C. Calhoun, for appellant. Allgood ■& Childs, Thomas F. Allgood, for appellee.

2. A motorist whose identity is known does not become an “unknown” motorist under the above statute merely because his whereabouts is unknown.

3. “Where there is no service at all there is no suit.” Toole v. Davenport & Smith, 63 Ga. 160 (2).

4. Accordingly, where there was no service of process in the plaintiff’s action against the known, allegedly uninsured, motorist, the verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff therein were null and void and the condition precedent to the plaintiff insured’s present action against the insurer does not exist; therefore, the court did not err in its judgment granting a summary judgment in favor of the defendant insurer.

Judgment affirmed.

Panned and Quillian, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rosenberg v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
293 S.E.2d 737 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
Norman v. Daniels
236 S.E.2d 121 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)
Wilkinson v. Craft
219 S.E.2d 4 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Goolsby v. Allstate Insurance
213 S.E.2d 42 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Railey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
201 S.E.2d 628 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)
Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Wilson
184 S.E.2d 21 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)
National Surety Corp. v. Hernandez
170 S.E.2d 318 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 S.E.2d 596, 119 Ga. App. 791, 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 1248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quattlebaum-v-allstate-insurance-company-gactapp-1969.