Quattlebaum v. Allstate Insurance Company
This text of 168 S.E.2d 596 (Quattlebaum v. Allstate Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. A condition precedent to an action against an insurer to recover benefits under uninsured motorists coverage, pursuant to Ga. L. 1963, p. 588; as amended, Ga. L. 1968, pp. 1415, 1416 (Code Ann. § 56-407.1), is the bring *792 ing of an action and the recovery of judgment against the known uninsured motorist. Gulf Amer. Fire &c. Co. v. McNeal, 115 Ga. App. 286, 292 (154 SE2d 411) and eit.
2. A motorist whose identity is known does not become an “unknown” motorist under the above statute merely because his whereabouts is unknown.
3. “Where there is no service at all there is no suit.” Toole v. Davenport & Smith, 63 Ga. 160 (2).
4. Accordingly, where there was no service of process in the plaintiff’s action against the known, allegedly uninsured, motorist, the verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff therein were null and void and the condition precedent to the plaintiff insured’s present action against the insurer does not exist; therefore, the court did not err in its judgment granting a summary judgment in favor of the defendant insurer.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
168 S.E.2d 596, 119 Ga. App. 791, 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 1248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quattlebaum-v-allstate-insurance-company-gactapp-1969.