Quatrino v. Anderson

87 A.D.2d 984, 450 N.Y.S.2d 368, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16523

This text of 87 A.D.2d 984 (Quatrino v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quatrino v. Anderson, 87 A.D.2d 984, 450 N.Y.S.2d 368, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16523 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and motion granted. Memorandum: Item Nos. 2, 3, 4, 6 and 7 in defendants’ demands for bills of particulars call for evidentiary material and plaintiff’s motion seeking a protective order striking them should have been granted (see McKenzie v St. Elizabeth Hosp., 81 AD2d 1003, 1004; Randall vPech, 51 AD2d 864). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Stone, J. — bills of particulars.) Present — Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Doerr, Denman and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McKenzie v. St. Elizabeth Hospital
81 A.D.2d 1003 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 A.D.2d 984, 450 N.Y.S.2d 368, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quatrino-v-anderson-nyappdiv-1982.