Quast v. State Bank of Wheaton
This text of 238 N.W. 677 (Quast v. State Bank of Wheaton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Certiorari to the industrial commission to review its order denying compensation for the death of Herman A. Quast, the petitioner being his widow.
At the time of his death, September 9, 1930, Mr. Quast was a director and president of respondent bank, doing business at Wheaton, the county seat of Traverse county. His death resulted from an accident to his automobile, which he was driving as a participant in a “good will tour” put on by Wheaton business men -to advertise the county fair soon to take place under the auspices of the Traverse County Agricultural Association. Putting aside the *330 question whether the employment of Mr. Quast was exclusively executive in character (Donaldson v. William H. B. Donaldson Co. 176 Minn. 422, 223 N. W. 772; Erickson v. Erickson Furniture Co. 179 Minn. 304, 229 N. W. 101) we find the record open to the conclusion that his participation in the good will tour was not referable to his connection with the bank, but only the voluntary act of a public-spirited citizen desiring to further community enterprise. That was the view taken by the industrial commission. It is so well founded in the evidence that it should not be disturbed.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
238 N.W. 677, 184 Minn. 329, 1931 Minn. LEXIS 1065, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quast-v-state-bank-of-wheaton-minn-1931.