Quartucci v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Quartucci v. State

736 So. 2d 1247, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8683, 1999 WL 436833

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 30, 1999

DocketNo. 99-1727

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 736 So. 2d 1247 (Quartucci v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Quartucci v. State, 736 So. 2d 1247, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8683, 1999 WL 436833 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence, seeking additional jail time credit, without prejudice to his filing (1) a rule 3.800 motion that affirmatively states where in the record the information concerning his jail service can be found and how the record demonstrates his entitlement to the additional days of jail time credit sought, or (2) a properly sworn rule 3.850 motion challenging the sentence based on the failure to award all jail time credit to which appellant is entitled. See Daily v. State, — So.2d -, 1999 WL 212859 (Fla. 4th DCA Apr.7, 1999); Toro v. State, 719 So.2d 947, 948 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); State v. Mancino; 714 So.2d 429, 433 (Fla.1998). Any rule 3.850 motion must be filed within the two-year time period provided by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(b) or within thirty days of the issuance of this [1248]*1248court’s mandate in the instant case, whichever is later.

GUNTHER, WARNER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence, seeking additional jail time credit, without prejudice to his filing (1) a rule 3.800 motion that affirmatively states where in the record the information concerning his jail service can be found and how the record demonstrates his entitlement to the additional days of jail time credit sought, or (2) a properly sworn rule 3.850 motion challenging the sentence based on the failure to award all jail time credit to which appellant is entitled. See Daily v. State, — So.2d -, 1999 WL 212859 (Fla. 4th DCA Apr.7, 1999); Toro v. State, 719 So.2d 947, 948 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); State v. Mancino; 714 So.2d 429, 433 (Fla.1998). Any rule 3.850 motion must be filed within the two-year time period provided by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(b) or within thirty days of the issuance of this [1248]*1248court’s mandate in the instant case, whichever is later.

GUNTHER, WARNER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

736 So. 2d 1247, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8683, 1999 WL 436833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quartucci-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack