Quarto v. Westchester Premier Theatre, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Quarto v. Westchester Premier Theatre, Inc.

52 A.D.2d 623, 382 N.Y.S.2d 353, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12252

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 19, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 52 A.D.2d 623 (Quarto v. Westchester Premier Theatre, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Quarto v. Westchester Premier Theatre, Inc., 52 A.D.2d 623, 382 N.Y.S.2d 353, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12252 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action inter alia for a declaratory judgment, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered July 10, 1975, which, inter alia, granted the motions of various parties to strike interrogatories. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements; respondents’ motions denied, the interrogatories are reinstated, and respondents are directed to comply with plaintiffs’ notice to produce. The time to answer the interrogatories and to comply with the notice to produce is extended until 30 days after entry of the order to be made hereon. Under the circumstances of this case, and the conceded impecuniousness of plaintiffs, there was no warrant for Special Term to make the protective order under review striking their interrogatories, since they were designed as an expense-saving procedure. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Shapiro and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action inter alia for a declaratory judgment, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered July 10, 1975, which, inter alia, granted the motions of various parties to strike interrogatories. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements; respondents’ motions denied, the interrogatories are reinstated, and respondents are directed to comply with plaintiffs’ notice to produce. The time to answer the interrogatories and to comply with the notice to produce is extended until 30 days after entry of the order to be made hereon. Under the circumstances of this case, and the conceded impecuniousness of plaintiffs, there was no warrant for Special Term to make the protective order under review striking their interrogatories, since they were designed as an expense-saving procedure. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Shapiro and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 A.D.2d 623, 382 N.Y.S.2d 353, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quarto-v-westchester-premier-theatre-inc-nyappdiv-1976.