Quarterman v. Pinkney

11 So. 3d 467, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8297, 2009 WL 1770118
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 24, 2009·No. 1D08-3601·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Dishaun Quarterman appeals a final judgment of injunction for protection against repeat violence. We find that the final judgment is supported by competent substantial evidence that Carmen Pinkney experienced an incident of stalking. See Lukacs v. Luton, 982 So.2d 1217 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). However, we reverse the provision in the final judgment directing Quarterman to pay damages of $1,770.44 to Carmen Pinkney as Quarterman was not given notice that a claim for damages would be heard or an opportunity to present her own case. Shocki v. Aresty, 994 So.2d 1131, 1134 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

WOLF, KAHN, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quarterman v. Pinkney, 11 So. 3d 467, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8297, 2009 WL 1770118 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

11 So. 3d 467 (Quarterman v. Pinkney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lukacs v. Luton
982 So. 2d 1217 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Shocki v. Aresty
994 So. 2d 1131 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)