Quarterman v. Pinkney

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Quarterman v. Pinkney

11 So. 3d 467, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8297, 2009 WL 1770118

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 24, 2009

Docket1D08-3601

StatusPublished

This text of 11 So. 3d 467 (Quarterman v. Pinkney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Quarterman v. Pinkney, 11 So. 3d 467, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8297, 2009 WL 1770118 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Dishaun Quarterman appeals a final judgment of injunction for protection against repeat violence. We find that the final judgment is supported by competent substantial evidence that Carmen Pinkney experienced an incident of stalking. See Lukacs v. Luton, 982 So.2d 1217 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). However, we reverse the provision in the final judgment directing Quarterman to pay damages of $1,770.44 to Carmen Pinkney as Quarterman was not given notice that a claim for damages would be heard or an opportunity to present her own case. Shocki v. Aresty, 994 So.2d 1131, 1134 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

WOLF, KAHN, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Dishaun Quarterman appeals a final judgment of injunction for protection against repeat violence. We find that the final judgment is supported by competent substantial evidence that Carmen Pinkney experienced an incident of stalking. See Lukacs v. Luton, 982 So.2d 1217 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). However, we reverse the provision in the final judgment directing Quarterman to pay damages of $1,770.44 to Carmen Pinkney as Quarterman was not given notice that a claim for damages would be heard or an opportunity to present her own case. Shocki v. Aresty, 994 So.2d 1131, 1134 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

WOLF, KAHN, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 So. 3d 467, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8297, 2009 WL 1770118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quarterman-v-pinkney-fladistctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack