Quartararo v. New York State Division of Parole

224 A.D.2d 266, 637 N.Y.S.2d 721, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1061
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 13, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 224 A.D.2d 266 (Quartararo v. New York State Division of Parole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quartararo v. New York State Division of Parole, 224 A.D.2d 266, 637 N.Y.S.2d 721, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1061 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Kristin Booth Glen, J.), entered August 14, 1995, which granted the petition in this proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, annulled the February and March 1994 determinations of respondent New York State Division of Parole denying, after hearings, petitioner’s application for release on parole, and ordered that he be released on parole, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating the direction to release petitioner on parole, and remanding the matter to respondent for a de novo hearing, before a different panel, to be conducted within 60 days of the date of this order and directing a decision thereon to be made within 30 days of the hearing, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The record supports the conclusion of the IAS Court that, in denying petitioner’s application for parole after the February and March hearings, respondent improperly considered factors outside the scope of Executive Law § 259-i and in violation of a prior court order. However, while we share the IAS Court’s concern over respondent’s failure, after three attempts, to provide petitioner with a fair hearing, the proper remedy is to remand the matter for a de novo hearing before a different panel rather than to order petitioner’s release on parole (see, Matter of King v New York State Div. of Parole, 83 NY2d 788). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Rubin, Ross and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Rossakis v. New York State Bd. of Parole
2016 NY Slip Op 7415 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Hartwell v. Division of Parole
57 A.D.3d 1139 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Oberoi v. Dennison
55 A.D.3d 1033 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Newton v. Dennison
47 A.D.3d 538 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Coaxum v. New York State Board of Parole
14 Misc. 3d 661 (New York Supreme Court, 2006)
Blanche v. Travis
306 A.D.2d 888 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Lichtel v. Travis
287 A.D.2d 837 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Thomas v. New York State Division of Parole
286 A.D.2d 393 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People ex rel. Quartararo v. Demskie
238 A.D.2d 792 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
224 A.D.2d 266, 637 N.Y.S.2d 721, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1061, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quartararo-v-new-york-state-division-of-parole-nyappdiv-1996.