Quarles v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Quarles v. State

552 S.W.3d 726

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 1, 2018

DocketNo. ED 105669

StatusPublished

This text of 552 S.W.3d 726 (Quarles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Quarles v. State, 552 S.W.3d 726 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Arlando Quarles appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Mo. Sup. Ct. Rule 24.035 (2016) without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. Sup. Ct. Rule 84.16(b) (2018).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Arlando Quarles appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Mo. Sup. Ct. Rule 24.035 (2016) without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. Sup. Ct. Rule 84.16(b) (2018).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

552 S.W.3d 726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quarles-v-state-moctapp-2018.