Quarles v. State
392 S.W.3d 574, 2013 WL 968103, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 313
Opinion
ORDER
Mr. Lamar D. Quarles appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion. He claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion to suppress his statements to the police.
For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Quarles v. State, 392 S.W.3d 574, 2013 WL 968103, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 313 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).
392 S.W.3d 574 (Quarles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.