Quaranto v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Quaranto v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

246 A.D. 776

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

In an action on a policy of life insurance the court denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment under rules 112 and 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, granted defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment pursuant to rules 113 and 114, and directed entry of judgment. Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Davis and Johnston, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action on a policy of life insurance the court denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment under rules 112 and 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, granted defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment pursuant to rules 113 and 114, and directed entry of judgment. Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Davis and Johnston, JJ.

Quaranto v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 246 A.D. 776 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

246 A.D. 776 (Quaranto v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.