Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Quandt v. Monroe

Quandt v. Monroe

331 So. 2d 318, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14140
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 30, 1976
DocketNo. 75-1351
StatusPublished

This text of 331 So. 2d 318 (Quandt v. Monroe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quandt v. Monroe, 331 So. 2d 318, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14140 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court erred in dismissing the third party complaint because a third party plaintiff is no longer bound by the allegations of plaintiff’s complaint characterizing the negligence. Pompano Beach Hotel Corporation v. Harker, Fla.App., 328 So.2d 468, Opinion issued March 5, 1976; Crawford Door Sales Company v. Donahue, 321 So.2d 624 (Fla.App.2d 1975); Central Truck Lines Inc. v. White Motor Corporation, 316 So.2d 579 (Fla.App.3d 1975); Gacl, Inc. v. Riviera Tile and Terrazzo Company, 300 So.2d 39 (Fla.App.3rd 1974).

Reversed and remanded with instructions to reinstate.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

WALDEN, C. J., DOWNEY, J., and MELVIN, WOODROW M., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crawford Door Sales Co., Inc. v. Donahue
321 So. 2d 624 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Central Truck Lines, Inc. v. White Motor Corp.
316 So. 2d 579 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
GACL, Inc. v. Riviera Tile & Terrazzo Co.
300 So. 2d 39 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Pompano Beach Hotel Corp. v. Harker
328 So. 2d 468 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
331 So. 2d 318, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quandt-v-monroe-fladistctapp-1976.