Quan M. Lacy v. William Hull, Jr.
This text of Quan M. Lacy v. William Hull, Jr. (Quan M. Lacy v. William Hull, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas
JUDGMENT
Quan M. Lacy, Appellant Appeal from the 89th District Court of Wichita County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. DC89- No. 06-21-00045-CV v. CV2021-0605). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice William Hull, Jr., Appellee Burgess and Justice Stevens participating.
As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal. We note that the appellant, Quan M. Lacy, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs. RENDERED OCTOBER 13, 2021 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Quan M. Lacy v. William Hull, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quan-m-lacy-v-william-hull-jr-texapp-2021.