Quan Jin v. William Barr
This text of Quan Jin v. William Barr (Quan Jin v. William Barr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 4 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
QUAN BIN JIN, No. 13-70415
Petitioner, Agency No. A087-957-040
v. ORDER WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 11, 2018* Honolulu, Hawaii
Before: WARDLAW, BERZON, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.
The panel has voted to grant Jin’s petition for panel rehearing in light of this
court’s en banc decision in Torres v. Barr, No. 13-70653, 2020 WL 5668478 (9th
Cir. Sept. 24, 2020) (en banc) (overruling Minto v. Sessions, 854 F.3d 619 (9th Cir.
2017)). The prior memorandum disposition (Dkt. 65) in this case is vacated. Jin’s
petition for rehearing en banc is denied as moot.
* The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Jin’s petition for review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals is
remanded to the agency to determine in the first instance whether alternative
grounds for removability exist under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6).
The petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED and the case is
REMANDED for further proceedings not inconsistent with this order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Quan Jin v. William Barr, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quan-jin-v-william-barr-ca9-2020.