Qualters' Estate
This text of 23 A. 348 (Qualters' Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
If the money in controversy really belonged to the appellant, and had been included in his account as administrator of his wife’s estate, by mistake or through ignorance of his rights, the court below would doubtless have allowed him to withdraw it from said account: Marshall v. Hoff, 1 W. 440; Miller’s Ap., 84 Pa. 391; High’s Est., 136 Pa. 236. The difficulty is the appellant has failed to establish a trust. Prima facie the money belonged to appellant’s wife in whose name it had been deposited, and the presumption thus raised has not been overcome.
The decree is affirmed, and the appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellant. C.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 A. 348, 147 Pa. 124, 1892 Pa. LEXIS 795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/qualters-estate-pa-1892.