Qualls v. Kijakazi

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided September 12, 2024·No. 2:23-cv-01071·Unknown

Opinion

Marc V. Kalagian Attorney at Law: 4460 Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, Inc., CPC 12631 East Imperial Highway Suite C-115 Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Tel.: (562) 868-5886 Fax: (562) 868-8868 E-mail: marc.kalagian@rksslaw.com Leonard Stone Attorney at Law: 5791 Shook & Stone 710 South 4th Street Las Vegas, NV 89101 Tel.: (702) 385-2220 Fax: (702) 384-0394 E-mail: Lstone@shookandstone.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Brenda Qualls BRENDA QUALLS, ) Case No.: 2:23-cv-01071-BNW ) Plaintiff, ) STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ) ORDER FOR THE AWARD AND vs. ) PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES ) AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO MARTIN O'MALLEY, ) THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE Commissioner of Social Security, ) ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND ) COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § Defendant. ) 1920 ) ) OF THE DISTRICT COURT: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Brenda Qualls (“Qualls”) be awarded attorney fees and expenses in the amount of SEVEN THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED dollars ($7,500.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and no costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920; 2412(d). After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Qualls, the government will consider the matter of Qualls's assignment of EAJA fees to Marc Kalagian. The retainer agreement containing the assignment is attached as exhibit 1. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2529 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset. Fees shall be made payable to Qualls, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Qualls does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, Inc., CPC, pursuant to the assignment executed by Qualls.1 Any payments made shall be delivered to Law Offices of Lawrence D.

Rohlfing, Inc., CPC. Counsel agrees that any payment of costs may be made either by electronic fund transfer (ETF) or by check. This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Qualls's request for EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall 1 The parties do not stipulate whether counsel for the plaintiff has a cognizable lien under federal law against the recovery of EAJA fees that survives the Treasury constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Qualls and/o Marc Kalagian including Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, Inc., CPC, may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action. This award is without prejudice to the rights of Marc Kalagian and/or the Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, Inc., CPC, to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of DATE: September 10, 2024 Respectfully submitted, LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING, INC., CPC /s| WUareV. Kabagian” BY: 1] Marc V. Kalagian Attorney for plaintiff DATED: September 10, 2024 JASON M. FRIERSON United States Attorney

Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant MARTIN O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security (Per e-mail authorization) ORDER Approved and so ordered: DATE: 9/12/2024 web THE HONORABLE BRENDA WEKSLER ? Counsel for the plaintiff attests that all other signatories listed, and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Qualls v. Kijakazi, (D. Nev. 2024).

Qualls v. Kijakazi (Qualls v. Kijakazi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)