Quallich v. Quallich

Cuyahoga Circuit Court

Quallich v. Quallich

23 Ohio C.C. Dec. 76, 14 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 524, 1905 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 321

CourtCuyahoga Circuit Court

DecidedMarch 28, 1905

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 23 Ohio C.C. Dec. 76 (Quallich v. Quallich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Cuyahoga Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Quallich v. Quallich, 23 Ohio C.C. Dec. 76, 14 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 524, 1905 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 321 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

HENRY, J.

This cause was begun by Caroline Quallich, who is here seeking alimony for her support while living apart from her husband. It is clear that a case must be made within the statute to permit the allowance of alimony without divorce. Nelson, Divorce and Separation, Sec. 1,000. None of the grounds for alimony without' divorce, enumerated in R. S. 5702 (Gen. Code 11997), has been proved. It is most certainly neither abandonment nor gross neglect of duty for a husband to refuse to support his wife while she is living elsewhere than in the home which he provides or tenders, if the home so offered her is a reasonable one under the circumstances.

In this case we find from the evidence that the husband has tendered to his wife a suitable home, and no reason appears why she should refuse this offer. The petition is dismissed.

Marvin and Winch, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HENRY, J.

This cause was begun by Caroline Quallich, who is here seeking alimony for her support while living apart from her husband. It is clear that a case must be made within the statute to permit the allowance of alimony without divorce. Nelson, Divorce and Separation, Sec. 1,000. None of the grounds for alimony without' divorce, enumerated in R. S. 5702 (Gen. Code 11997), has been proved. It is most certainly neither abandonment nor gross neglect of duty for a husband to refuse to support his wife while she is living elsewhere than in the home which he provides or tenders, if the home so offered her is a reasonable one under the circumstances.

In this case we find from the evidence that the husband has tendered to his wife a suitable home, and no reason appears why she should refuse this offer. The petition is dismissed.

Marvin and Winch, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 Ohio C.C. Dec. 76, 14 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 524, 1905 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quallich-v-quallich-ohcirctcuyahoga-1905.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack