QualiZeal, Inc., Pradeep Govindasamy, and Kalyana Roa Konda v. Cigniti Technologies, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 5, 2022·No. 05-22-00923-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered December 5, 2022

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-22-00923-CV

QUALIZEAL, INC., PRADEEP GOVINDASAMY, AND KALYANA ROA KONDA, Appellants

V.

CIGNITI TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-17023

ORDER Before Justices Molberg, Pedersen, III, and Goldstein

Before the Court are appellants’ motion for temporary relief and appellee’s

response. We DENY the motion.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered December 5, 2022

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-22-00923-CV

QUALIZEAL, INC., PRADEEP GOVINDASAMY, AND KALYANA ROA KONDA, Appellants

V.

CIGNITI TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-17023

ORDER Before Justices Molberg, Pedersen, III, and Goldstein

Before the Court are appellants’ motion for temporary relief and appellee’s

response. We DENY the motion.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE

QualiZeal, Inc., Pradeep Govindasamy, and Kalyana Roa Konda v. Cigniti Technologies, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Pincite

QualiZeal, Inc., Pradeep Govindasamy, and Kalyana Roa Konda v. Cigniti Technologies, Inc. (QualiZeal, Inc., Pradeep Govindasamy, and Kalyana Roa Konda v. Cigniti Technologies, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.