Quality Property Solutions, LLC v. Steffernie Shaw
This text of Quality Property Solutions, LLC v. Steffernie Shaw (Quality Property Solutions, LLC v. Steffernie Shaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued September 21, 2023
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00016-CV ——————————— QUALITY PROPERTY SOLUTIONS, LLC, Appellant V. STEFFERNIE SHAW, Appellee
On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 2 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 446657-401
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Quality Property Solutions, LLC attempts to appeal from the trial
court’s judgment signed August 18, 2022.
Generally, a notice of appeal is due within thirty days after the judgment is
signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. The deadline to file a notice of appeal is extended
to 90 days after the date the judgment is signed if any party timely files a motion for new trial, motion to modify the judgment, motion to reinstate, or, under certain
circumstances, a request for findings of fact and conclusions of law. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 26.1(a). The time to file a notice of appeal may also be extended if, within
15 days after the deadline to file the notice of appeal, a party properly files a motion
for extension. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b), 26.3.
The record reflects that the trial court signed the final judgment on August 18,
2022. Appellant timely filed a motion for new trial on September 19, 2022. See TEX.
R. CIV. P. 329b(a). Therefore, appellant’s notice of appeal was due by November
16, 2022. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a).
Appellant untimely filed his notice of appeal on December 30, 2022. Without
a timely filed notice of appeal, this Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 25.1.
On August 21, 2023, we notified appellant that the appeal was subject to
dismissal for want of jurisdiction unless, by August 31, 2023, it filed a response
showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). Appellant
has not adequately responded to our notice.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Hightower and Countiss.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Quality Property Solutions, LLC v. Steffernie Shaw, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quality-property-solutions-llc-v-steffernie-shaw-texapp-2023.