Quality Importers, Inc. v. United States

42 Cust. Ct. 269
United States Customs Court·Decided January 27, 1959·No. No. 62710; protests 208027-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

An examination of the collector’s reports, received in evidence at the trial, shows that duty and internal revenue tax were assessed on certain missing merchandise. Following United States v. R. C. Williams & Co., Inc. (40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc. v. United States (22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quality Importers, Inc. v. United States, 42 Cust. Ct. 269 (cusc 1959).

42 Cust. Ct. 269 (Quality Importers, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. R. C. Williams & Co.
40 C.C.P.A. 130 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1953)
Austin, Nichols & Co. v. United States
22 Cust. Ct. 33 (U.S. Customs Court, 1949)