Quality Glass & Mirror, Inc. v. Ritch

373 So. 2d 723, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15418
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 9, 1979·No. No. MM-337·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court granted summary judgment for appellees Ritch and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Corporation on the ground that their performance and payment bond was a statutory bond pursuant to Section 255.05, Florida Statutes (1977), and that appellant, plaintiff below, filed his complaint alleging nonpayment for materials after the statutory one year limitation period on actions had expired. We hold that even though this bond contained provisions not required by Section 255.05, the bond must be considered statutory and not common law, which would be subject to a longer limitation period, because the bond [724]*724did not expand the payment provisions beyond those stated in Section 255.05.

AFFIRMED.

MILLS, C. J., and ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr. and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quality Glass & Mirror, Inc. v. Ritch, 373 So. 2d 723, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15418 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

373 So. 2d 723 (Quality Glass & Mirror, Inc. v. Ritch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

National Fire Ins. Co. v. LJ Clark Const. Co., Inc.
579 So. 2d 743 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Florida Keys Comm. Coll. v. Ins. Co. of North Am.
456 So. 2d 1250 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)