Quality Car Co. v. Corkill

Appellate Court of Illinois

Quality Car Co. v. Corkill

182 Ill. App. 175

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedOctober 9, 1913

DocketGen. No. 18,375

StatusPublished

This text of 182 Ill. App. 175 (Quality Car Co. v. Corkill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Quality Car Co. v. Corkill, 182 Ill. App. 175 (Ill. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Gbidley

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Bills and notes, § 27*—sufficiency of delivery. A delivery of a note to an agent of the payee is a sufficient delivery. 2. Bills and notes, § 121*—authority to indorse. No particular form of appointment is necessary to authorize a person to indorse a promissory note as agent. 3. Bills and notes, § 375*—"burden of proof. Introduction of a promissory note in evidence without objection makes a prima facie case for plaintiff, and the burden of proving that the note was without consideration and was a mere accommodation note is upon the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Gbidley

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Bills and notes, § 27*—sufficiency of delivery. A delivery of a note to an agent of the payee is a sufficient delivery. 2. Bills and notes, § 121*—authority to indorse. No particular form of appointment is necessary to authorize a person to indorse a promissory note as agent. 3. Bills and notes, § 375*—"burden of proof. Introduction of a promissory note in evidence without objection makes a prima facie case for plaintiff, and the burden of proving that the note was without consideration and was a mere accommodation note is upon the defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

182 Ill. App. 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quality-car-co-v-corkill-illappct-1913.