Qualcomm Incorporated v. Intel Corporation

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedMarch 2, 2021
Docket20-1574
StatusUnpublished

This text of Qualcomm Incorporated v. Intel Corporation (Qualcomm Incorporated v. Intel Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Qualcomm Incorporated v. Intel Corporation, (Fed. Cir. 2021).

Opinion

Case: 20-1574 Document: 61 Page: 1 Filed: 03/02/2021

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, Appellant

v.

INTEL CORPORATION, Appellee

ANDREW HIRSHFELD, PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor ______________________

2020-1574 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2018- 01261, IPR2018-01293, IPR2018-01295, IPR2018-01344, IPR2018-01346. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________ Case: 20-1574 Document: 61 Page: 2 Filed: 03/02/2021

JENNIFER L. SWIZE, Jones Day, Washington, DC, ar- gued for appellant. Also represented by ISRAEL SASHA MAYERGOYZ, Chicago, IL; ROBERT BREETZ, DAVID B. COCHRAN, DAVID MICHAEL MAIORANA, JOSEPH M. SAUER, Cleveland, OH; MATTHEW JOHNSON, JOSHUA R. NIGHTINGALE, Pittsburgh, PA.

THOMAS SAUNDERS, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by DAVID LANGDON CAVANAUGH; JOSEPH F. HAAG, Palo Alto, CA; RAUVIN A. JOHL, YVONNE S. LEE, Boston, MA.

WILLIAM LAMARCA, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for intervenor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, ROBERT J. MCMANUS, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, BRYSON, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 2, 2021 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Qualcomm Incorporated v. Intel Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/qualcomm-incorporated-v-intel-corporation-cafc-2021.