Qualcomm Incorporated Securities Litigation v. Qualcomm Incorporated

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. California
DecidedJanuary 10, 2020
Docket3:17-cv-00121
StatusUnknown

This text of Qualcomm Incorporated Securities Litigation v. Qualcomm Incorporated (Qualcomm Incorporated Securities Litigation v. Qualcomm Incorporated) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Qualcomm Incorporated Securities Litigation v. Qualcomm Incorporated, (S.D. Cal. 2020).

Opinion

9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12 IN RE QUALCOMM Case No. 17-cv-00121-BEN-MSB INCORPORATED SECURITIES 13 LITIGATION ORDER GRANTING NON-PARTIES 14 APPLE INC.; COMPAL ELECTRONICS, INC.; FIH MOBILE LTD.; HON HAI 15 PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD.; PEGATRON CORPORATION; AND 16 WISTRON CORPORATION’S 17 ASSENTED-TO MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE PROTECTIVE 18 ORDER 19

21 WHEREAS Section 3.5 of the Protective Order in this action (ECF No. 78- 22 1) states that its provisions are without prejudice to the right of any party to seek 23 further or additional protection of any Discovery Material or to modify the 24 Protective Order; and, 25 WHEREAS Section 10.1 of the Protective Order states that its provisions 26 should not be construed as prohibiting a non-party from seeking additional 27 1 protections for its confidential materials; and 2 WHEREAS now before the Court is Non-Parties Apple Inc. (“Apple”), 3 Compal Electronics, Inc. (“Compal”), Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. (“Hon 4 Hai”), FIH Mobile Ltd. (“FIH”), Pegatron Corporation (“Pegatron”), and Wistron 5 Corporation’s (“Wistron,” and collectively, the “CMs”) Assented-To Motion to 6 Supplement the Protective Order; 7 WHEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the terms of the 8 Protective Order apply to “APPLE PROTECTED MATERIAL” and “CM 9 PROTECTED MATERIAL” (as defined below), except as modified below: 10 1. DEFINITIONS 11 1.1. “APPLE MATERIAL”: any Disclosure or Discovery Materials 12 produced by, deemed produced by, reproduced on behalf of, or with the consent 13 of Apple, or obtained from Apple witnesses. For such material, the Apple will be 14 deemed a “Producing Party” as that term is used here and in the Protective Order. 15 1.2. “CM MATERIAL”: any Disclosure or Discovery Materials 16 originally produced by, deemed produced by, reproduced on behalf of, or with the 17 consent of Compal, Hon Hai, FIH, Pegatron, or Wistron, or obtained from 18 Compal, Hon Hai, FIH, Pegatron, or Wistron witnesses. For such material, the 19 respective CM will be deemed a “Producing Party” as that term is used here and 20 in the Protective Order. 21 1.3. “APPLE CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: any APPLE 22 MATERIAL previously designated by Apple as CONFIDENTIAL, APPLE 23 CONFIDENTIAL, SD CAL CONFIDENTIAL, or any variant of 24 “CONFIDENTIAL” in the FTC Litigation, Apple Litigation, CM Litigation, or ITC 25 Litigation. 26 1.4. “APPLE HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” 27 Information or Items: any APPLE MATERIAL previously designated by Apple as 1 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY, APPLE HIGHLY 2 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY, SD CAL HIGHLY 3 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY, CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS 4 INFORMATION, or any variant of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” in the FTC 5 Litigation, Apple Litigation, CM Litigation, or ITC Litigation. 6 1.5. “APPLE PROTECTED MATERIAL”: any APPLE CONFIDENTIAL 7 or APPLE HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY Information 8 or Items. 9 1.6. “CM CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: any CM MATERIAL 10 previously designated by Compal, Hon Hai, FIH, Pegatron, or Wistron as 11 CONFIDENTIAL, COMPAL CONFIDENTIAL, FOXCONN CONFIDENTIAL, 12 PEGATRON CONFIDENTIAL, WISTRON CONFIDENTIAL, SD CAL 13 CONFIDENTIAL, or any variant of “CONFIDENTIAL” in the FTC Litigation, 14 Apple Litigation, CM Litigation, or ITC Litigation. 15 1.7. “CM HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” 16 Information or Items: any CM MATERIAL previously designated as HIGHLY 17 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY, COMPAL HIGHLY 18 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY, FOXCONN HIGHLY 19 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY, PEGATRON HIGHLY 20 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY, WISTRON HIGHLY 21 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY, or any variant of “HIGHLY 22 CONFIDENTIAL” in the FTC Litigation, Apple Litigation, CM Litigation, or ITC 23 Litigation. 24 1.8. “CM PROTECTED MATERIAL”: any CM CONFIDENTIAL or CM 25 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY Information or Items. 26 1.9. “Outside Counsel of Record”: attorneys who are not employees of a 27 Party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a Party in connection with 1 this Action and have entered an appearance on behalf of that Party in this Action, as 2 well as other attorneys or support staff employed by the same firm as one of the 3 attorneys who has entered an appearance on behalf of one of the Parties in this 4 Action, to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this 5 Action. 6 2. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 7 2.1. Confidential Material. Except as modified herein, APPLE 8 CONFIDENTIAL and CM CONFIDENTIAL Information and Items shall be treated 9 in accordance with the provision of the Protective Order that govern the treatment of 10 CONFIDENTIAL Information and Items. 11 2.2. Disclosure of APPLE CONFIDENTIAL or CM CONFIDENTIAL 12 Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or permitted in writing 13 by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any Information or Item 14 designated APPLE CONFIDENTIAL or CM CONFIDENTIAL only to: 15 (a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this action, 16 as well as employees of said Outside Counsel of Record, and any copying or clerical 17 litigation support services working at the direction of such Outside Counsel of 18 Record or employees thereof (1) who do not provide commercial advice (as opposed 19 to legal advice) to the Receiving Party and (2) to whom it is reasonably necessary to 20 disclose the information for this Action; 21 (b) five (5) or fewer House Counsel or other agreed-upon Party 22 representatives identified and agreed upon between the Party, on one hand, and 23 Apple (for APPLE CONFIDENTIAL Information or Items) or Compal, Hon Hai, 24 FIH, Pegatron, and/or Wistron (for CM CONFIDENTIAL Information or Items 25 respectively) on the other hand, prior to any disclosure, (1) to whom disclosure is 26 reasonably necessary for this Action, (2) who are not involved in competitive 27 decision- making (as opposed to legal advice), as defined by U.S. Steel v. United 1 States, 730 F.2d 1465, 1468 n.3 (Fed. Cir. 1984), on behalf of a Party, or a 2 competitor of a Party, relating to the cellular industry, and (3) who have signed the 3 “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A), as well as their 4 support staff to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary, provided that such support 5 staff are not involved in competitive decision-making and have signed the 6 “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); 7 (c) experts (as defined in the Protective Order) retained by the 8 Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation 9 provided that (1) such Expert has signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to 10 Be Bound” (Exhibit A); (2) such Expert has no involvement in competitive 11 decision-making (as defined by U.S. Steel v. United States, 730 F.2d 1465, 1468 n.3 12 (Fed. Cir. 1984)) for the Receiving Party; (3) to the extent required by U.S. 13 government export control and economic sanctions laws, including the U.S.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Qualcomm Incorporated Securities Litigation v. Qualcomm Incorporated, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/qualcomm-incorporated-securities-litigation-v-qualcomm-incorporated-casd-2020.