Quaker Lane, LP v. Iva Robbins
This text of 585 F. App'x 252 (Quaker Lane, LP v. Iva Robbins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Defendants, Iva and Ivan Robbins, seek to appeal the district court’s orders remanding the underlying unlawful detainer action to state court and denying their motion for reconsideration. Defendants have also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. We deny in forma pau-peris status and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
Subject to exceptions not applicable here, “[a]n order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed is not reviewable on appeal or otherwise.” 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2012); see E.D. ex rel. Darcy v. Pfizer, Inc., 722 F.3d 574, 579-83 (4th Cir.2013). Because the district court’s orders do not fall within any of the exceptions provided by § 1447, the orders are not appealable.
Accordingly, we deny Defendants’ application to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
585 F. App'x 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quaker-lane-lp-v-iva-robbins-ca4-2014.