Quaker Lane, LP v. Iva Robbins

585 F. App'x 252
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 24, 2014
Docket14-1714
StatusUnpublished

This text of 585 F. App'x 252 (Quaker Lane, LP v. Iva Robbins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quaker Lane, LP v. Iva Robbins, 585 F. App'x 252 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Defendants, Iva and Ivan Robbins, seek to appeal the district court’s orders remanding the underlying unlawful detainer action to state court and denying their motion for reconsideration. Defendants have also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. We deny in forma pau-peris status and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Subject to exceptions not applicable here, “[a]n order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed is not reviewable on appeal or otherwise.” 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2012); see E.D. ex rel. Darcy v. Pfizer, Inc., 722 F.3d 574, 579-83 (4th Cir.2013). Because the district court’s orders do not fall within any of the exceptions provided by § 1447, the orders are not appealable.

Accordingly, we deny Defendants’ application to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

E.D. ex rel. Darcy v. Pfizer, Inc.
722 F.3d 574 (Fourth Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
585 F. App'x 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quaker-lane-lp-v-iva-robbins-ca4-2014.