Quaker City Nat. Bank v. Nolan County

66 F. 883, 14 C.C.A. 157, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2622
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 11, 1894·No. No. 234·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

McCOIiMIOK, Circuit Judge.

The questions involved in this case are not open questions in this court. On reasoning which we have approved, and still consider sound and sufficient, both of the vital propositions submitted have been decided by the supreme court of Texas adversely to the contention of the plaintiff in error. Citizens’ Bank v. City of Terrell, 78 Tex. 456, 14 S. W. 1003; Nolan Co. v. State, 83 Tex. 183, 17 S. W. 823; Francis v. Howard Co., 4 C. C. A. 460, 54 Fed. 487; Millsaps v. City of Terrell, 8 C. C. A. 554, 60 Fed. 193. We have read with care and interest the learned and able brief submitted for the plaintiff in error, but are unwilling to open the questions which we have settled on full argument of counsel, and careful consideration by the court. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quaker City Nat. Bank v. Nolan County, 66 F. 883, 14 C.C.A. 157, 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2622 (5th Cir. 1894).

66 F. 883 (Quaker City Nat. Bank v. Nolan County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weinberger v. Board of Public Instruction
112 So. 253 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)
Wilson v. Board of Education
81 N.W. 952 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1900)
Wade v. Travis County
81 F. 742 (Fifth Circuit, 1897)