Quailes v. Landrum

Supreme Court of Georgia

Quailes v. Landrum

175 S.E. 490, 179 Ga. 179, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 247

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 12, 1934·No. No. 10045·Published

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

This case was submitted to the presiding judge without the intervention of a jury. After hearing the evidence submitted by both parties, the court rendered a judgment finding in favor of the defendant. A motion for new trial was made, which contained only the general grounds. An examination of the record shows that the evidence authorized the judgment rendered by the court.

Judgment ¡affirmed.

All the Justices concur except Russell, O. J., absent because of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beck, P. J.

This case was submitted to the presiding judge without the intervention of a jury. After hearing the evidence submitted by both parties, the court rendered a judgment finding in favor of the defendant. A motion for new trial was made, which contained only the general grounds. An examination of the record shows that the evidence authorized the judgment rendered by the court.

Judgment ¡affirmed.

All the Justices concur except Russell, O. J., absent because of illness.

Quailes v. Landrum, 175 S.E. 490, 179 Ga. 179, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 247 (Ga. 1934).

Pincite

175 S.E. 490 (Quailes v. Landrum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.