Quailes v. Landrum

Supreme Court of Georgia

Quailes v. Landrum

175 S.E. 490, 179 Ga. 179, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 247

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJuly 12, 1934

DocketNo. 10045

StatusPublished

This text of 175 S.E. 490 (Quailes v. Landrum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Quailes v. Landrum, 175 S.E. 490, 179 Ga. 179, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 247 (Ga. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

This case was submitted to the presiding judge without the intervention of a jury. After hearing the evidence submitted by both parties, the court rendered a judgment finding in favor of the defendant. A motion for new trial was made, which contained only the general grounds. An examination of the record shows that the evidence authorized the judgment rendered by the court.

Judgment ¡affirmed.

All the Justices concur except Russell, O. J., absent because of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beck, P. J.

This case was submitted to the presiding judge without the intervention of a jury. After hearing the evidence submitted by both parties, the court rendered a judgment finding in favor of the defendant. A motion for new trial was made, which contained only the general grounds. An examination of the record shows that the evidence authorized the judgment rendered by the court.

Judgment ¡affirmed.

All the Justices concur except Russell, O. J., absent because of illness.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 S.E. 490, 179 Ga. 179, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quailes-v-landrum-ga-1934.